Legal professional says Stamford has no energy to set time period limits

STAMFORD — An legal professional advising the town’s Constitution Revision Fee had unhealthy information for supporters of time period limits for native elected officers: They can not do it.

The Board of Representatives in February appointed 15 residents to the fee, which is able to recommend adjustments to Stamford’s constitution as a part of a course of that occurs at the very least as soon as each 10 years.

The board then gave the group an inventory of concepts to think about. One of many gadgets on the listing was time period limits for elected places of work.

However legal professional Steve Mednick advised a panel of metropolis representatives final week that such time period limits could be unlawful.

“The difficulty of time period limits all the time comes up in each city, each metropolis that I’ve executed charters in,” Mednick mentioned. “And I might be issuing an opinion principally that states that time period limits usually are not authorized within the state of Connecticut for elected officers.”

Mednick mentioned he has consulted on 30 or so charters throughout the state, together with in 9 of Connecticut’s 12 largest municipalities.

Similar Posts